Advanced Integrated Laboratory Report Grading Rubric
Notes regarding course incomes : The areas that are colored represent criteria in which you are supposed to be proficient from previous classes; these criteria/skills are required incomes. The incomes have been developed in previous Chemistry courses. A deficiency in 2 or more incomes (shaded areas) results in a penalty of 25 points and requires revision within 72 hours after your lab report grade was posted in VISTA; please check VISTA frequently. If the revisions are not completed within the deadline, the lab report incomes will not be regraded.
Deficiencies in the (uncolored) outcomes areas of the rubric will not be regraded in the revised report.
Required Incomes |
Points lost |
|
Plagiarism Report is unacceptable and is returned without further review. One revision is allowed. |
||
Formatting Deficiency in 2 or more categories, without revision, results in the loss of 10 points |
Check here if deficient |
|
page numbers, spell-checking by computer |
||
chemical names not capitalized, sentences start with letters only |
||
consistent units and variable names |
||
superscripts, subscripts, Greek symbols |
||
descriptive graph titles and table titles |
||
graphs and tables sequentially numbered |
||
graph axes labeled. |
||
descriptive column titles on tables |
||
Mathematical and chemical equations clearly and consecutively numbered. |
||
Mathematical and chemical equations indented, set off from text by carriage returns. |
||
Uncertainties included in tabulated data. |
||
Mathcad regions clearly annotated |
||
Bibliography: list of references in standard format |
||
Printouts from instrumentation must be clearly labeled. (Can scan the printout). Caption or titles must be typed, not handwritten. Need appropriate labeling of variables. Need to decide what is in the caption or description. |
English |
||
Spelling and Grammar Deficiency in 2 or more categories, without revision, results in the loss of 20 points |
Check here if deficient |
Points lost |
proofread for typos by a human being, correct spelling |
||
third-person passive; no pronouns. “The solutions were placed in the UV-Visible spectrophotometer.” NOT “Next we will put the sample in the UV-Vis.” |
||
constant and logical verb tenses; (past tense except in rare situations.) |
||
appropriate punctuation |
||
subject/verb agreement; parallel construction |
||
complete sentences; no run-on sentences |
||
no dangling prepositions; no split infinitives |
||
no awkward sentence construction |
||
Stylistic |
||
varied sentence structure |
||
writing expresses author's meaning |
||
paragraphs used appropriately |
||
writing flows logically and smoothly |
||
no unnecessary words (then, next, after this was done: can’t use any of these words more than once per page!!!) |
Content: Description |
||
Outline (5 points) Deficiency = - 5 points |
Check here if deficient |
Points lost |
report includes an outline with the list of ideas in a logical order; thoughts in the report are expressed in a linear fashion; one idea (outline entry) per paragraph |
||
Abstract (10 points) Deficiency in 2 or more categories, without revision, results in the loss of 10 points |
Check here if deficient |
|
abstract is a succinct summary |
||
goal of the experiment is clearly stated |
||
experimental technique(s) are clearly described |
||
results are stated |
||
conclusions are concise and clear |
||
Background/Introduction (20 points) Deficiency in 1 category = - 4 points Deficiencies in 2 - 3 categories = - 12 points Deficiencies in >3 categories = - 20 points |
Check here if deficient |
Points lost |
statement and purpose of planned experiment |
||
review of prior experimental results (at FSC or in the literature, cited properly) |
||
discussion of relevant theoretical principles (with equations) |
||
referenced source for derivation of equations |
||
chemical reaction equation(s) shown |
||
Safety Deficiency in 2 or more categories, without revision, results in the loss of 10 points |
||
chemical structures and corresponding names are shown in table format |
||
safety precautions summarized and explained for hazardous compounds |
||
Safety data is complete, accurate and includes references. |
||
physical properties for all chemicals listed (color, phase at room temperature, bp. for liquids, mp. for solids) |
||
Experimental details Deficiency in 2 or more categories, without revision, results in the loss of 20 points |
Check here if deficient |
|
concise, complete explanation of actual experimental procedure |
||
summary of dead-end experiments if applicable |
||
names and brands of instruments, equipment, software, computers (for calculational experiments) and chemicals |
||
deviations from and additions to previous work |
||
Content: Analysis |
||
Calculations and Error calculations and propagation. (20 points) Deficiency in 1 category = - 5 points Deficiencies in 2 - 3 categories = - 10 points Deficiencies in >3 categories = - 20 points |
Check here if deficient |
Points lost |
written-out sample of each calculation (even spreadsheet) |
||
calculations are correct |
||
critical, justified assignment of uncertainty present in all raw data |
||
propagation of uncertainty through the calculations |
||
all numbers (both data and results) are accompanied by uncertainties (number ± uncertainty). |
||
Data, Results, Discussion (including analysis of error). (15 points) Deficiency in 1 category = - 5 points Deficiencies in 2 - 3 categories = - 10 points Deficiencies in >3 categories = - 15 points |
Check here if deficient |
Points lost |
compiled primary data and calculated results appropriately |
||
table of results (with corresponding uncertainties and an appropriate number of significant figures) provided |
||
tables and graphs discussed sequentially |
||
equation describing each plot |
||
explanation of how data has been extracted from each plot |
||
definite and concise conclusions |
||
comparison to previous workers' results |
||
appropriate citations to previous work |
||
Procedure analysis. (10 points) Deficiency in 1 category = - 3 points Deficiencies in 2 - 3 categories = - 6 points Deficiencies in > 3 categories = - 10 points |
Check here if deficient |
Points lost |
Summary of encountered problems was provided |
||
explanation of encountered problems was provided |
||
explanation of encountered problems is reasonable and scientific in nature. This should include mathematical proof if possible |
||
suggestions for improvement by future workers are provided |
||
Summary |
|
Number of incoming deficiencies |
|
Number of outcome deficiencies |
|
Total points lost |
|
Total points (out of 100) |
|